Attestor · Trust Signals

Trust Signals

Trust signals are observations, records, indicators, events, or relationships that may influence how observers understand trust, reputation, accountability, and confidence.

Trust signals do not determine trust. They provide information that may help explain why trust may exist.

Attestation Signals

Statements made by identities, organizations, institutions, or systems may become signals that contribute trust-related context.

Conceptual

Evidence Signals

Supporting documents, records, sources, and evidence relationships may become signals that influence confidence and evaluation.

Conceptual

Verification Signals

Verification outcomes, certification records, and validation activity may create signals relevant to trust and reputation.

Planned

Reputation Signals

Historical activity, repeated behavior, community observations, and accumulated records may contribute to reputation over time.

Exploratory

Accountability Signals

Clear attribution, transparent corrections, visible responsibility, and reviewable records may strengthen trust-related understanding.

Conceptual

Correction Signals

Corrections, amendments, clarifications, and retractions may themselves become signals of transparency and accountability.

Conceptual

Signal Direction

Trust signals may be positive, negative, neutral, mixed, or uncertain. Their meaning depends on context, evidence, history, and interpretation.

Signal → Context → Evaluation → Trust

Trust Signal Philosophy

Attestor does not use trust signals to impose conclusions. Instead, trust signals preserve information that may help observers evaluate statements, identities, evidence, records, and relationships more transparently.

Back to Attestor →

Trust signals do not create trust. They help explain why trust may emerge.