Accuracy
Determines whether submitted information correctly represents the certification target without factual error or misrepresentation.
Suite · Methodology
Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation Criteria define the objective measures used to assess certification targets in a consistent, transparent, and repeatable manner.
Every certification is evaluated using documented criteria rather than opinion, ensuring that equivalent evidence produces equivalent outcomes.
Completeness
Evaluates whether all required information, evidence, and supporting documentation have been provided.
Authenticity
Assesses whether submitted evidence is genuine, verifiable, and originates from reliable sources.
Integrity
Determines whether records and evidence remain unaltered, internally consistent, and free from unauthorized modification.
Authority
Evaluates whether evidence originates from individuals or organizations with appropriate authority over the subject matter.
Timeliness
Considers whether evidence remains sufficiently current and relevant for the intended certification.
Consistency
Ensures evidence, documentation, and certification records do not conflict with one another or previous verified records.
Transparency
Evaluates whether the reasoning, evidence, and methodology supporting certification remain understandable and reviewable.
Reproducibility
Determines whether independent reviewers applying the same methodology would reasonably reach the same conclusion.
Risk
Assesses the potential impact of uncertainty, missing evidence, conflicting information, or unresolved issues on certification confidence.
Methodology Role
Evaluation Criteria provide the objective framework used to assess certification targets. Together they establish a repeatable basis for scoring, certification logic, and final certification decisions throughout the Satoshium Suite.
Consistent evaluation requires consistent criteria.