Purpose
The Anchoring Process provides the repeatable institutional path for creating an Integrity Reference without transferring authority away from the system that owns the referenced artifact.
The Anchoring Process defines how an authoritative artifact becomes associated with a durable Anchor Integrity Reference.
The process begins with source authority and representation definition, not with hashing. Integrity is meaningful only when Anchor knows exactly what is being referenced and why that representation is stable enough to verify later.
The Anchoring Process provides the repeatable institutional path for creating an Integrity Reference without transferring authority away from the system that owns the referenced artifact.
Anchor does not create the substantive artifact or determine what it means. Anchor begins when a candidate artifact is identified for integrity preservation.
Before integrity material is generated, Anchor must identify the Source Institution and confirm which artifact is authoritative for the representation being anchored.
The process exists so a future reviewer can reproduce or validate integrity material and compare a reviewed representation with the Integrity Reference.
The production Anchoring Process is now:
This sequence is no longer conceptual only; it is aligned with Anchor's completed Validation, Verification, Publication, Versioning, Procedures, and first-production architecture.
Identify the record, package, file, publication, statement, dataset, or other governed object whose integrity should be preserved.
Confirm the Source Institution, Source-System Identifier where one exists, artifact type, and authority boundary before Anchor creates its own Integrity Reference.
Determine the exact representation processed for integrity. For the first production candidate:
Explicitly identify what content is covered by the Integrity Reference. For IR #1, the boundary is:
Linked Certification Package, SCPR, SCR, SCRD HTML, Atlas, Registry, and Chronicle records remain outside this Representation Boundary unless separately anchored.
Select the governed integrity mechanism and algorithm. For IR #1:
SHA-256 is the Suite's initial approved interoperable digest algorithm, not a permanent definition of Anchor.
Generate the Integrity Value from the governed Canonical Representation.
Record the metadata needed to reproduce or validate the integrity result, including algorithm information, timestamps, signatures, representation instructions, and external commitment references where applicable.
Assemble the Anchor-owned Integrity Reference candidate under the Base Schema. For the first production record:
Construction now uses the staged production model:
Validation evaluates institutional and schema conformance. Verification tests whether the reconstructed Canonical Representation reproduces the preserved Integrity Value.
A candidate proceeds to publication only after final Validation PASS and Publication Gate approval.
Publication changes the Anchor Publication State from unpublished to published and makes the approved Anchor Version publicly authoritative for its own Integrity Reference metadata.
Review the Integrity Reference when the Source Artifact changes, a reference breaks, an algorithm becomes unsuitable, verification fails, or later integrity review is institutionally required.
Preserve prior material states, Corrections, Versions, verification history, and later Integrity References so the integrity history remains reconstructable over time.
The Anchoring Process produces an Anchor-owned Integrity Reference.
The Integrity Reference Base Schema now defines this production structure.
A hash is useful only when a later reviewer can determine exactly what representation produced it.
Anchor therefore does not treat:
as a sufficient institutional instruction.
The process must first establish:
Hashing may generate a deterministic Integrity Value for a defined Canonical Representation. Hashing is a mechanism within the process, not the process itself.
Timestamps preserve temporal context and should be labeled by meaning, such as anchoring time, observation time, publication time, or verification time.
Signatures may support integrity or origin verification. They do not automatically establish substantive authority, truth, certification, reputation, or trust.
External commitments, including possible future Bitcoin commitments, may strengthen long-term independently reviewable integrity without defining Anchor's institutional identity.
A Source Artifact may legitimately change after an Integrity Reference is created.
A later Source Artifact Version, Correction, lifecycle change, migration, or new canonical representation does not erase the earlier integrity relationship.
Later Integrity Verification begins with the preserved Integrity Reference and the artifact representation under review.
A match supports integrity consistency. A mismatch requires investigation.
A mismatch does not automatically establish tampering, wrongdoing, falsity, or loss of institutional authority.
Anchor owns the Integrity Reference.
The Source Institution continues to own the authoritative artifact and its substantive status, meaning, certification, historical interpretation, or trust context.
This candidate is assigned but not yet published. It must still complete Stage A Validation, Initial Verification, Stage B Publication-Readiness Validation, and the Publication Gate.
Anchoring is not a declaration of truth. It is the governed creation of a durable integrity relationship between an Anchor Integrity Reference and a defined artifact representation.
The process should remain reproducible, reviewable, implementation-neutral, and minimal enough to preserve integrity without duplicating the authoritative record.