Atlas Framework Specification
Federal Overlay Model
Federal overlays are interpretive continuity surfaces that help Atlas describe nationally coordinated infrastructure influence without converting federal presence into canonical corridor authority.
This framework defines how federal overlays reinforce continuity interpretation across jurisdictions while remaining subordinate to the Atlas topology contract, corridor-group placement, foundation-layer classification, and completion-layer participation.
Core Rule: Federal overlays are continuity amplifiers rather than topology origin sources.
Purpose
Interpretive Reinforcement, Not Placement Authority
Federal overlays describe national-scale infrastructure systems that reinforce corridor continuity across jurisdictions. They support interpretation, strengthen adjacency confidence, clarify infrastructure dependence, and extend continuity visibility.
They help Atlas describe nationally coordinated infrastructure influence without altering the canonical topology contract.
Definition
What Counts as a Federal Overlay
A federal overlay is infrastructure continuity derived from nationally coordinated systems including national laboratories, defense infrastructure, DOE transmission corridors, interstate transmission designation, federal compute systems, and federal logistics networks.
Federal overlays may strengthen interpretation across multiple jurisdictions, but they do not independently create corridor placement authority.
Authority Limits
What Federal Overlays Must Not Do
Federal overlays must not:
- assign anchor status
- assign transit status
- assign terminus status
- override completion-layer placement
- replace corridor-role classification
The topology trio remains authoritative. Federal overlays may strengthen the plausibility, continuity, or bounded stability of a reading, but they may not convert support into canonical placement authority.
Participation Categories
Recognized Overlay Types
- national-laboratory continuity
- DOE corridor infrastructure
- defense infrastructure networks
- interstate transmission designation
- federal compute backbone
- federal logistics continuity
Boundary Rule: Overlay blending is not permitted. If multiple overlays are relevant, they must remain distinguishable rather than collapsing into a generic federal-strength claim.
Shared overlay visibility does not imply identical corridor-role strength, foundation participation depth, or completion-layer placement.
Overlay Category
National Laboratory Overlay Participation
National laboratory overlays include DOE national labs, federally administered research campuses, and federal experimental infrastructure complexes.
- strengthen research corridor continuity
- strengthen innovation adjacency interpretation
- strengthen federal infrastructure visibility
They do not independently establish anchor placement and do not replace canonical topology or evidence requirements.
Overlay Category
DOE Corridor Infrastructure Overlay
DOE overlays include national transmission initiatives, federal energy corridor designations, grid modernization backbone participation, and regional transmission reinforcement planning corridors.
- strengthen energy-foundation interpretation continuity
- indicate reinforcement relevance
- remain overlay support rather than primary placement authority
DOE overlays do not independently assign corridor origin authority.
Overlay Category
Defense Infrastructure Overlay
Defense overlays include military logistics corridors, defense compute infrastructure, defense research facilities, and strategic mobility systems.
- strengthen transport continuity interpretation
- strengthen federal logistics visibility
- strengthen research infrastructure participation
They must remain interpretation-support structures only and may not independently assign corridor roles.
Overlay Category
Interstate Transmission Designation Overlay
Designation overlays include federally designated transmission corridors, regional transmission priority zones, and multi-state infrastructure reinforcement surfaces.
- strengthen energy-foundation stacking interpretation
- strengthen corridor continuity plausibility
- strengthen adjacency-supported transmission reasoning
A designation may matter structurally without becoming topology origin authority by itself.
Overlay Category
Federal Compute Infrastructure Overlay
Federal compute overlays include national computing facilities, federal HPC systems, DOE compute backbone infrastructure, and defense compute clusters.
- strengthen compute-foundation continuity interpretation
- remain distinct from hyperscale private-sector compute placement signals
- must not be conflated with non-federal compute anchor logic unless canonical evidence explicitly supports that conclusion
Overlay Category
Federal Logistics Continuity Overlay
Federal logistics overlays include strategic freight coordination corridors, military logistics alignment systems, federal emergency transport continuity infrastructure, and interstate mobilization corridors.
- strengthen transport-foundation continuity reasoning
- clarify why a jurisdiction matters for continuity
- do not independently establish corridor-role authority
Interaction Rule
Interaction with the Topology Trio
Federal overlays must defer to:
- corridor-group placement
- foundation-layer classification
- completion-layer participation
Overlay visibility strengthens interpretation clarity but does not modify placement authority. Overlay relevance may influence interpretation, but it may not alter the trio fields or their authority.
Interaction Rule
Interaction with Corridor Roles
Federal overlays may:
- reinforce anchor stability interpretation
- clarify transit continuity plausibility
- strengthen support-node interpretation
- improve expansion-edge trajectory confidence
Federal overlays must not:
- create anchor roles
- create transit roles
- create terminus roles
- override role classification
Interaction Rule
Interaction with Foundation Types
Federal overlays commonly stack with:
- energy foundation
- compute foundation
- research foundation
- transport foundation
Overlay stacking must remain explicit. Implicit cross-foundation inheritance is not permitted. When multiple overlays affect the same jurisdiction, dominant overlay dependence must remain explicitly identifiable.
Interaction Rule
Interaction with Signals
Federal overlays may appear as:
- continuity-support signals
- infrastructure reinforcement indicators
- federal participation visibility markers
They must not convert signals into evidence, replace corridor-role classification, or override topology placement. Signal taxonomy remains authoritative.
Interaction Rule
Interaction with Trust Dimensions
Federal overlays may strengthen:
- continuity confidence
- infrastructure stability interpretation
- adjacency reliability interpretation
Overlay presence must not create deployment readiness inference, certification posture inference, or corridor sufficiency inference. Trust dimensions remain non-scoring interpretive structures.
Interaction Rule
Interaction with Builder Mode
Builder-mode interpretation may reference overlays to:
- clarify infrastructure dependence
- highlight federal continuity participation
- describe reinforcement environments
Builder Mode must not treat overlays as siting authority signals. Deployment posture remains evidence-bound.
Rendering Rule
Rendering Visibility Rules
The renderer may:
- display overlay participation layers
- visualize federal continuity surfaces
- highlight overlay stacking with foundations
The renderer must not:
- upgrade overlays to topology authority
- collapse overlays into corridor roles
- remove overlay dependence visibility
Rendering Principle: Overlay presence may be surfaced visually, narratively, or through helper summaries, but it must remain visibly subordinate to the canonical topology contract.
Compliance
Federal Overlay Compliance Definition
A jurisdiction package is federal-overlay compliant when:
- overlay participation remains evidence-grounded
- overlay stacking remains explicit
- overlay roles remain interpretation-bound
- topology authority remains unchanged
Non-compliance occurs when:
- overlays imply anchor authority
- overlays replace corridor roles
- overlays override foundation classification
- overlays produce deployment inference
Version · v1 — Initial Atlas federal overlay participation specification