Atlas Framework Specification
Signals Update Protocol
The Signals Update Protocol defines how jurisdiction signals evolve while preserving evidence → signals derivation integrity across the Atlas jurisdiction intelligence engine.
This protocol governs when signals may structurally change, what downstream layers must be reviewed, and how corridor-assignment-matrix synchronization is recorded without letting matrix alignment drift ahead of its evidence basis.
Core Rule: Signals update only when structural evidence changes. Matrix alignment changes alone do not trigger signal updates.
Purpose
What Atlas Signals Represent
Atlas signals represent evidence-derived structural observations describing jurisdiction environments. They are the derivation layer sitting between raw canonical evidence and downstream trust interpretation, profile characterization, and builder-mode reading.
Signals describe jurisdiction environments affecting:
- AI infrastructure posture
- Bitcoin regulatory compatibility
- compute-energy geography
- institutional research presence
- municipal experimentation structure
- corridor adjacency potential
Integrity Requirements
What Signals Must Remain
Signals carry downstream weight across every Atlas layer. To preserve that weight, signals must remain internally consistent and externally portable.
- evidence-derived — never inherited, never inferred without canonical backing
- jurisdiction-lens aligned — consistent with the canonical topology lens
- cross-state comparable — same taxonomy, same granularity across jurisdictions
- export-compatible — structured for downstream machine-readable formats
Update Triggers
When Signals May Change
Signals update only when structural evidence changes. The evidence layer is the upstream authority; signals follow it, not the reverse.
Signals must not update based on matrix drift:
- matrix alignment changes alone do not trigger signal updates
- corridor reassignment alone does not trigger signal updates
- signal updates require supporting evidence changes
Governing Principle: Evidence changes authorize signal changes. Without an underlying evidence change, signal stability must be preserved even when downstream structures shift.
Change Classification
Structural vs Observational Changes
Atlas distinguishes two change categories. Each category touches a different, well-bounded set of canonical files — the distinction keeps the package audit trail legible and prevents trust or profile drift from observational noise.
Structural changes modify:
signals.md
trust-dimensions.md (review only)
profile.md (if topology shifts)
Observational changes modify only:
Scope Rule: Observational changes never reach the signal, trust, or profile layers. Only structural changes — changes rooted in canonical evidence — propagate through the derivation chain.
Matrix Synchronization
Corridor Assignment Matrix Synchronization
When signals change structurally, downstream consistency must be checked against the corridor assignment matrix at /atlas/corridors/corridor-assignment-matrix.md. The matrix does not author signals; it records where signal-consistent placement sits in the corridor registry.
If matrix alignment changes:
- update
metadata.md
- update corridor registry participation (if applicable)
- record adjustment in
change-log.md
Directionality: Signals remain upstream authority relative to corridor classification. Matrix updates follow signal changes, not the other way around.
Machine-Readable Compatibility
Export Format Support
Signals are authored as canonical Markdown, but the derivation structure is designed to support machine-readable export without loss of meaning. Each downstream surface has a paired export target.
signals.json
trust-dimensions.json
metadata.json
corridors.json
Export Stability: Signal taxonomy and cross-state comparability are maintained precisely so these export formats remain structurally valid across the 50-state canonical package without normalization loss.
Protocol Summary
Signals Update Protocol — Flow
Authorized update chain:
- canonical evidence change occurs
signals.md updates derive from evidence
trust-dimensions.md reviewed for downstream consistency
profile.md updated only if topology shifts
- matrix alignment checked against updated signals
metadata.md and corridor registry updated if needed
change-log.md records the adjustment
Protocol violations:
- signals updated without evidence support
- matrix drift used as justification for signal change
- observational change reaches trust, profile, or signal layers
- corridor reassignment promoted ahead of signal update
- export taxonomy broken by non-canonical signal edits
Version · Signals Update Protocol — Satoshium Atlas Jurisdiction Intelligence Engine